Fed, Biden Administration Float New Lending Rules for Lower-Income Areas

The proposed revamp comes at a time when the Democratic Biden administration has pledged to do more to address disparities in wealth, incomes and access to financial services among Black Americans and other racial minority groups.

The Community Reinvestment Act is designed to end “redlining”—banks’ historical practice of avoiding lending in certain areas, often lower-income communities, frequently leading to stark economic disparities along racial lines. The law is one of the major tools the government uses to encourage banks to lend more to low- and moderate-income communities.

In recent years, the law has become a source of conflict between community groups that want the rules to be enforced more strongly and bankers who argue the regulations are too bureaucratic and haven’t kept up with technological changes, among other criticisms. Banks are typically examined every three years on their

CRA

efforts. A bad grade effectively prohibits mergers.

Thursday’s proposal, set to be unveiled by the Federal Reserve and two other banking regulators, aims to make rules more transparent and objective, potentially making it easier for banks to understand their regulatory requirements, though the firms could face heightened reporting mandates.

Under existing rules, banks must lend to lower-income communities in the area around their offices, even though they now accept deposits and make loans around the country via online accounts. This has led to a glut of reinvestment act spending in places such as Salt Lake City, where dozens of banks are headquartered but have no branches elsewhere.

If Thursday’s plan is finalized in the coming months, it would aim to spread online banks’ related activities nationally. Banks would be assessed for the CRA obligations even in areas where they don’t have physical offices, if they make a certain number of loans in a particular area, according to people familiar with the proposal.

“Hopefully, they will eliminate some of the guesswork while also encouraging creativity and innovation, and recognize that the impact of everything can’t be measured by dollars alone,” said Warren Traiger, senior counsel at law firm Buckley LLP, who advises clients on compliance with the act.

In addition to the Federal Reserve, two other top bank regulators, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., are expected to sign on to the proposal. All three bank regulators are charged with overseeing the 1977 law and pledged last year to move jointly to modernize their rules. Regulators will have to collect public comment on the proposal before it can be finalized.

Thursday’s proposal comes after the OCC, which oversees national banks and the bulk of the activity under the low-income lending rules, in December rescinded Trump administration rule changes before banks were required to comply. That plan came from former Comptroller

Joseph Otting,

an appointee of former Republican President

Donald Trump,

and wasn’t supported by the Fed and the FDIC.

Fed officials, led by incoming Vice Chairwoman

Lael Brainard,

said the 2020 OCC plan was rushed and could inadvertently decrease lending to lower-income areas. Ms. Brainard, a Fed governor since 2014, led a competing Fed effort to rewrite its CRA rules while central bank officials pledged to work with the other banking agencies on a unified set of new standards.

At present, banks are evaluated on compliance with the act based on a complex formula that includes loans to home buyers and small businesses, as well as the number of branches in lower-income areas. Most banks get passing grades on their CRA examinations.

The Consumer Bankers Association said it welcomed regulators modernizing rules that haven’t been updated in over two decades, since before the widespread adoption of smartphones and mobile banking. “For decades, banks have invested trillions of dollars into underserved communities,” said

Richard Hunt,

the industry group’s president and chief executive, in a written statement. The association hopes the plan “provides the clarity, certainty, and flexibility banks need.”

Consumer advocates said they hoped the proposal would boost banks’ obligations under the law. “The impact will be pretty clearly to raise the bar in terms of what’s expected from banks,” said Jesse Van Tol, president and chief executive of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, a fair-lending advocacy group.

Mr. Van Tol said there is a major gap in one aspect of the proposal: It wouldn’t apply to the nonbank financial firms that now provide the bulk of the consumer loans in the U.S., such as in the mortgage market. Nonbanks originated about 75.5% of government-backed home loans as of March 2022, according to the Urban Institute.

Although some states like Illinois and New York have implemented their own reinvestment requirements that apply to nonbanks, Congress would need to act to expand federal requirements. Last year, Fed Chairman

Jerome Powell

suggested Congress should act to extend the rules to cover all firms providing consumer credit, not just banks.

“Like activities should have like regulation,” Mr. Powell said last May.

Nonbank mortgage lenders say expanding CRA to cover their firms would be a mistake, arguing they have different business models that don’t involve taking deposits that are then reinvested into their communities.

“The Community Reinvestment Act for independent mortgage bankers is nonsensical and a solution in search of a problem,” said Robert Broeksmit, president and chief executive of the Mortgage Bankers Association.

Write to Andrew Ackerman at andrew.ackerman@wsj.com