Why Rental Properties Are Worse Than REITs In Most Cases

In a recent article, I explained that now could be a good time to buy a rental property. That’s because:

• Inflation is high and potentially accelerating.

• Rentals allow you to borrow a lot of cheap fixed-rate debt.

• The war in Ukraine is introducing new risks.

• Diversification is growing in importance.

• You may not want all your assets to be publicly-traded.

While I stand by that article, I think that quite a few people misunderstood its conclusions. A lot of people appear to have concluded that based on this article, they should favor rentals over publicly listed REITs when in reality, it is the opposite.

I strongly believe that REITs remain far better investments in most cases. My argument was simply that investing in rental properties may make sense as a tool to achieve even greater diversification. However, they are not a replacement for REITs, which remain far more important as part of a diversified real estate investment strategy.

In fact, I have 90% of my real estate allocation invested in REITs today, and only 10% in rentals. While I have already written quite a few articles on this topic, I wanted to write a quick follow-up on all the reasons why I think that REITs are superior investments in most cases.

Below I share a succinct summary of 10 points for you to consider. This is coming from someone who has been investing in both for over a decade and dedicated his career to real state investing.

Reason #1: REITs Are More Lucrative in Most Cases

I will start with this because it is probably the most contested argument.

Rental investors argue that they are able to achieve higher returns by using high leverage and skipping management costs. But their argument misses several important points that tip the balance in favor of REITs.

First off, REITs also use leverage. When you invest in a REIT, you are providing the equity and it is the equity value that you see traded on the stock market. It is therefore a misconception to think that rentals are more rewarding because of leverage as both enjoy the same benefits.

Secondly, you cannot ignore management costs by simply assuming that you are going to be the manager. Your time still has value and the opportunity costs need to be taken into account. If you could earn $30 per hour working a regular job, but you use your productive time to work on rentals, you are effectively losing $30 each hour. When you properly account for that, the management of rental properties is extremely inefficient and costly when you are lacking scale. Often, most of your returns are actually coming from labor, and not from the investment itself. REITs, on the other hand, have a huge scale, which results in more cost-efficient management even despite paying high salaries for the managers.

But it does not stop there.

Several studies argue that REITs are much more lucrative investments because they have many levers to boost returns that rental investors simply don’t have. This includes the following:

• Scale Cost Advantage: REITs save costs on all fronts by having a scale advantage. Not just the management, but also building costs, renovation projects, financing costs, brokerage, etc.

• Scale Return Advantage: The scale of REITs also give them preferential relationships with major tenants. This helps them secure better leases, faster, and with better terms, creating more value in the process.

• Spread Investing: REITs are able to raise capital through public equity markets to buy more assets. As long as they can raise capital at a cost that’s inferior to their expected returns, there is a spread to be earned that boosts their growth rate. This is how REITs are commonly able to grow their dividend by 5-8% per year, whereas most rental investors only grow rents by ~2% per year. This difference in growth adds up over time.

• Development Projects: REITs don’t just buy stabilized assets. They also buy land, get permits, build themselves, lease the property, etc. to create more value and earn higher returns.

• Value-Add Projects: REITs also buy underperforming assets and then work on them to fix issues, grow rents, and earn superior returns. You need to be a dedicated professional to identify and complete such projects.

• Real Estate Related Businesses: REITs also operate other businesses that are synergetic to their real estate investments. As an example, they may offer property management services to other investors to earn additional fees.

• Better Alignment of Incentives: REIT managers typically own a large stake in the company. The value of their stake is commonly a multiple of their salary, and their salary is also tied to shareholder value creation. As such, a REIT manager will typically do a much better job than a regular property manager that simply takes a fee on your rental income.

• REITs Avoid Worst Case Scenarios: REITs are much more conservative with their leverage than most rental investors and mainly target higher quality, higher growth properties. Naturally, this results in lower yields in the immediate terms, but it also results in more growth over time, less pain during downturns, and higher returns over the full cycle.

Therefore, it would be logical for REITs to outperform rental properties. After all, they are targeting the same asset type, both use leverage, both REITs have many more levers to boost returns.

But don’t take this just from me. Several independent studies confirm this point. Once you properly account for the indirect management cost of rental properties, REITs outperform rental properties by ~2-4% per year on average, over a full market cycle:

Note that this is the average of the REIT market vs. the average of the rental market. This is not to say that rental properties can’t be more lucrative than this. Surely, there are some exceptional deals out there. But the same is true for REITs. To have an objective, apple-to-apple comparison of returns, we need to look at averages, and studies and logic would tell you that REITs are likely to be more rewarding investments in most cases.

Reason #2: REITs Give You The Benefits of Leverage Without Putting Your Personal Credit On The Line

We already explained that REITs give you the same benefits of leverage. You provide the equity and the REITs then add debt to it.

However, a big difference is that REIT investors aren’t signing on any of the loans and therefore, their liability risk is limited. They are not putting their personal credit on the line, which is a huge risk mitigation that most rental investors don’t appear to comprehend.

If things go south, REIT investors cannot lose more than what they invested. However, there are countless stories of rental investors that go bankrupt each year because they used too much leverage and were on the hook for it.

Reason #3: REITs Limit Your Personal Liability

REITs don’t only protect you from the liability of leverage. They also protect you from all other sorts of liability risks.

Since you are just a minority shareholder of a limited liability corporation, you won’t ever have tenants, contractors, brokers, etc. sue you.

If you own rental properties long enough, it is nearly certain that you will eventually face some legal disputes. These will take a lot of financial but also emotional resources. In a worst-case scenario, you could lose it all and then some if you are found guilty of something, whether intentional or not.

Just to give you one example: I have seen cases of landlords being sued by the tenant who developed asthma due to the mold that grew in the bathroom, which he didn’t ventilate properly. If the landlord is found guilty, the consequences could be substantial.

When you invest in REITs, your personal liability is protected and the REITs are used to dealing with these situations and have the scale to hire lawyers in a cost-efficient way when needed.

Reason #4: REITs Are Completely Passive

This is a very important and hugely underappreciated point in my opinion.

Rental properties are work-intensive. Owning rentals is more similar to running a business than owning passive investments.

Even if you assumed that REITs were going to be somewhat less rewarding, I think that they would still provide better hassle-adjusted returns because they are completely passive.

Ask yourself: Would you prefer to earn a passive and safer 12% annual return or a work-intensive and riskier 14% return?

Reason #5: REITs Are Liquid

Most of my REIT investments are long-term oriented and therefore, I don’t really need the daily liquidity.

However, the liquidity is still a major advantage because it allows me to efficiently add more capital to my investments each month as soon as the cash becomes available.

If you are buying rentals, you will need to save more months or years with your cash sitting in an account, losing its value to inflation.

If you invest in REITs, you can immediately and efficiently put that capital to work. Your capital scales much better and you don’t lose any compounding benefits.

Reason #6: REIT Investors Pay No Transaction Costs

When you buy a rental property, you will commonly pay 5-10% in diverse transaction costs on day 1. That money is lost immediately.

If you put 20% down, and you pay 5% in transaction cost, that essentially means that your equity value is down 25% on the first day of your investment, and you then need to make up for this before you start earning a return.

In comparison, REIT investors pay no transaction costs because they are simply buying an interest in an already existing portfolio of properties.

Simply saving these transaction costs makes a huge difference in your returns.

These fees may also reoccur someday as you sell your property.

Reason #7: REITs Are Highly Tax Efficient

There are misconceptions that REITs are less tax-efficient than…